Articles tagged as "Issue #82 - June 21, 2010"

HIV This Week Issue #82

Welcome to the 82nd issue of HIV This Week !  In this issue, we cover the following topics:

1. Refugees and internally displaced persons

2. Epidemiology

3. Financing

4. Vaccines

5. Tuberculosis

6. Universal Access

7. Men who have sex with men

8. Co-Morbidity: HIV and Worms

9. PMTCT

10. Human Rights

11. Treatment

12. Orphans and HIV

 

To find out how you can access a majority of scientific journals free of charge, please see the last page of this issue or check the HIV This Week website clicking here.

If you are reading this through the kindness of a friend and would like to subscribe to receive HIV This Week pdf issues by email, you can sign up by clicking here. To unsubscribe, please click the following link: unsubscribe.

We want to be as helpful to you as we can, so please let us know what your interests are and what you think of HIV This Week by sending a comment to hivthisweek@unaids.org or by posting one on the HIV This Week weblog. If you would like to recommend an article for inclusion, please contact HIV This Week here.

Don’t forget that you can find a wealth of information on the HIV epidemic and responses to it at www.unaids.org.

Cate Hankins, Chief Scientific Adviser to UNAIDS
Precious Lunga, Research Officer
Tania Lemay, Research Consultant
Gladys Tagi, Assistant

For full PDF access to this issue:
No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Refugees and Internally displaced persons

Conflict-affected displaced persons need to benefit more from HIV and malaria national strategic plans and Global Fund grants.

Spiegel PB, Hering H, Paik E, Schilperoord M. Confl Health. 2010;4:2

Access to HIV and malaria control programmes for refugees and internally displaced persons is not only a human rights issue but a public health priority for affected populations and host populations. The primary source of funding for malaria and HIV programmes for many countries is the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund). This article analyses the current HIV and malaria National Strategic Plans and Global Fund approved proposals from rounds 1-8 for countries in Africa hosting populations with refugees and/or internally displaced persons to document their inclusion. The review was limited to countries in Africa as they constitute the highest caseload of refugees and internally displaced persons affected by HIV and malaria. Only countries with a refugee and/or internally displaced persons population of >/= 10,000 persons were included. National Strategic Plans were retrieved from primary and secondary sources while approved Global Fund proposals were obtained from the organisation's website. Refugee figures were obtained from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees' database and internally displaced persons figures from the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The inclusion of refugees and internally displaced persons was classified into three categories: 1) no reference; 2) referenced; and 3)   referenced with specific activities. A majority of countries did not mention internally displaced persons (57%) compared with 48% for refugees in their HIV National Strategic Plans. For malaria, refugees were not included in 47% of National Strategic Plans compared with 44% for internally displaced persons. A minority (21-29%) of HIV and malaria National Strategic Plans referenced and included activities for refugees and internally displaced persons. There were more approved Global Fund proposals for HIV than malaria for countries with both refugees and internally displaced persons, respectively. The majority of countries with >/=10,000 refugees and internally displaced persons did not include these groups in their approved   proposals (61%-83%) with malaria having a higher rate of exclusion than HIV. Countries that have signed the 1951 refugee convention have an obligation to care for refugees and this includes provision of health care. Internally displaced persons are citizens of their own country but like refugees may also not be a priority for Governments' National Strategic Plans and funding proposals. Besides legal obligations, Governments have a public health imperative to include these groups in National Strategic Plans and funding proposals. Governments may wish to add a component for refugees that is additional to the needs for their own citizens. The inclusion of forcibly displaced persons in funding proposals may have positive direct effects for host populations as international and United Nations agencies often have strong logistical capabilities that could benefit both populations. For National Strategic Plans, strong and concerted advocacy at global, regional and country levels needs to occur to   successfully ensure that affected populations are included in their plans. It is essential for their inclusion to occur if we are to reach the stated goal of universal access and the Millennium Development Goals.

For full text access click here:

Editor’s Note: Despite public commitments by 189 countries to incorporate refugees and internally displaced persons in national HIV strategies, only Egypt and Sierra Leone have included activities for refugees in both their HIV national strategic plans (NSP) and approved Global Fund proposals. Out of 33 African countries with more than 10,000 refugees, 6 countries included them in NSP and 8 in approved Global Fund proposals. Out of 22 countries with more than 10,000 internally displaced persons, 3 countries included them in NSP and 5 in approved Global Fund proposals. This is surprising because refugees and internally displaced persons are often located in isolated and inaccessible areas where government services for the local population are usually poor and where funding proposals for integrated services could have positive direct effects for host populations. Thus, in addition to human rights principles and a public health rationale, there is a straightforward pragmatic health services strengthening justification for addressing the needs of conflict-affected displaced persons.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Refugees and Internally displaced persons

Within but without: human rights and access to HIV prevention and treatment for internal migrants.

Todrys KW, Amon JJ. Global Health. 2009;5:17

Worldwide, far more people migrate within than across borders, and although internal migrants do not risk a loss of citizenship, they frequently confront significant social, financial and health consequences, as well as a loss of rights. The recent global financial crisis has exacerbated the vulnerability internal migrants face in realizing their rights to health care generally and to antiretroviral therapy in particular. For example, in countries such as China and Russia, internal migrants who lack official residence status are often ineligible to receive public health services and may be increasingly unable to afford private care. In India, internal migrants face substantial logistical, cultural and linguistic barriers to HIV prevention and care, and have difficulty accessing treatment when returning to poorly served rural areas. Resulting interruptions in HIV services may lead to a wide range of negative consequences, including: individual vulnerability to infection and risk of death; an undermining of state efforts to curb the HIV epidemic and provide universal access to treatment; and the emergence of drug-resistant disease strains. International human rights law guarantees individuals lawfully within a territory the right to free movement within the borders of that state. This guarantee, combined with the right to the highest attainable standard of health set out in international human rights treaties, and the fundamental principle of non-discrimination, creates a duty on states to provide a core minimum of health care services to internal migrants on a non-discriminatory basis. Targeted HIV prevention programs and the elimination of restrictive residence-based eligibility criteria for access to health services are necessary to ensure that internal migrants are able to realize their equal rights to HIV prevention and treatment.

For full text access click here: 

Editor’s Note: Far more people migrate within their country than out of it. China has more than 140 million and India more than 250 million internal migrants. Internal migrants change residence from one civil division to another in their country of origin for social, political, or financial reasons or in the wake of natural disaster. This article highlights the negative health consequences of internal registration systems, such as hukuo (China) and propiska (Russia) or state-specific government ration cards (India), which are compounded by deepening health and social inequalities in the wake of the global financial crisis. The lack of access to and lack of continuity in antiretroviral treatment services for internal migrants, who are often doubly stigmatised, along with gaps in HIV prevention programmes, are creating the conditions for failure to reach national goals of reduced HIV incidence and disease burden. The right to the highest attainable standard of health, the principle of non-discrimination, and the right to free movement within state borders are all international human rights law guarantees to which signatory countries are legally bound. Immediate steps to end discrimination in health care provision for internal migrants should be high on every country’s agenda.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Epidemiology

The Likoma Network Study: Context, data collection, and initial results.

Helleringer S, Kohler HP, Chimbiri A, Chatonda P, Mkandawire J. Demogr Res. 2009;21:427-468

The extent and structure of sexual networks have important consequences for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV. However, very few datasets currently exist that allow a detailed investigation of sexual networks in sub-Saharan African settings where HIV epidemics have become generalized. In this paper, the authors describe the context and methods of the Likoma Network Study, one of the few studies that have collected extensive information on sexual networks in sub-Saharan Africa. They start by reviewing theoretical arguments and empirical studies emphasizing the importance of network structures in the epidemiology of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. The island setting of this study is described, and the authors argue that the choice of an island as a research site limited potential biases that may make the collection of sexual network data difficult. Helleringer and colleagues then document their empirical strategy for the collection of sexual network data and the subsequent identification of sexual network partners. A description of the protocol for the collection of biomarker data (HIV infection) is provided. Finally, they present initial results relating to the socioeconomic context of the island, the size and composition of sexual networks, the quality of the sexual network data, the determinants of successful contact tracing during the Likoma Network Study, and the prevalence of HIV in the study population.

For full text access click here: 

Editor’s note: Although Likoma Island in Lake Malawi is 18 square kilometres and has a population of only 7000 people living in a dozen villages, it has contributed substantially to our understanding of the role of sexual networks in generalized epidemics. Only 7 of 1235 households refused to be interviewed about socioeconomic information and in the seven villages chosen for the sexual network survey (representing 50.9% of 18-35 year olds on Likoma), the participation rate was 88%. Whereas Demographic and Heath Surveys are ‘egocentric’, meaning that they rely on self-reports that have to be taken at face value, the Likoma Study is ‘socio-centric’. It provides detailed data on the extent and structure of sexual networks and evaluates data quality by determining rates of inter-partner agreement about sexual relationships. Understanding patterns of connectivity and overlap between relationships informs modelling of the sexual spread of HIV and can assist in the design of context-appropriate HIV prevention programmes. A big challenge is to explain how individuals are part of sexual networks, even if they themselves have only one partner.

Epidemiology
No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Epidemiology

HIV mortality and infection in India: estimates from nationally representative mortality survey of 1.1 million homes.

Jha P, Kumar R, Khera A, Bhattacharya M, Arora P, Gajalakshmi V, Bhatia P, Kam D, Bassani DG, Sullivan A, Suraweera W, McLaughlin C, Dhingra N, Nagelkerke N; Million Death Study Collaborators. BMJ 2010;340:c62

The aim of the study was to determine the rates of death and infection from HIV in India by analysing a nationally representative survey of deaths. The study population covered 1.1 million homes in India. The population included 123,000 deaths at all ages from 2001 to 2003. The main outcomes were HIV mortality and infection. HIV accounted for 8.1% (99% confidence interval 5.0% to 11.2%) of all deaths among adults aged 25-34 years. In this age group, about 40% of deaths from HIV were due to AIDS, 26% were due to tuberculosis, and the rest were attributable to other causes. Nationally, HIV infection accounted for about 100,000 (59,000 to 140,000) deaths or 3.2% (1.9% to 4.6%) of all deaths among people aged 15-59 years. Deaths from HIV were concentrated in the states and districts with higher HIV prevalence and in men. The mortality results imply an HIV prevalence at age 15-49 years of 0.26% (0.13% to 0.39%) in 2004, comparable to results from a 2005/6 household survey that tested for HIV (0.28%). Collectively, these data suggest that India had about 1.4-1.6 million HIV infected adults aged 15-49 years in 2004-6, about 40% lower than the official estimate of 2.3 million for 2006. All cause mortality increased in men aged 25-34 years between 1997 and 2002 in the states with higher HIV prevalence but declined after that. HIV prevalence in young pregnant women, a proxy measure of incidence in the general population, fell between 2000 and 2007. Thus, HIV mortality and prevalence may have fallen further since this study. HIV attributable death and infection in India is substantial, although it is lower than previously estimated.

For full text access click here: 

Editor’s note: What is important about this study is not the impressively large numbers – 900 field interviewers recorded symptoms, signs, and key circumstances leading to death for 132, 626 deaths that occurred in a nationally representative sample of 1.1 million homes. Rather, it is that setting up a sample registration system from a national census, as the Government of India has done, creates a framework for reporting causes of death through household visits. This information can be triangulated with data from cohort studies of people living with HIV, results of demographic and health surveys that include HIV testing, sentinel surveillance using HIV testing, and other data to improve national monitoring of HIV and measure the population-level impact of prevention and treatment services.

Epidemiology
No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Financing

Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-national systematic analysis.

Lu C, Schneider MT, Gubbins P, Leach-Kemon K, Jamison D, Murray CJ. Lancet. 2010;375:1375-87

Government spending on health from domestic sources is an important indicator of a government's commitment to the health of its people, and is essential for the sustainability of health programmes. The study aimed to systematically analyse all data sources available for government spending on health in developing countries; describe trends in public financing of health; and test the extent to which they were related to changes in gross domestic product (GDP), government size, HIV prevalence, debt relief, and development assistance for health to governmental and non-governmental sectors. The authors did a systematic analysis of all data sources available for government expenditures on health as agent (GHE-A) in developing countries, including government reports and databases from WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). GHE-A consists of domestically and externally financed public health expenditures. They assessed the quality of these sources and used multiple imputation to generate a complete sequence of GHE-A. With these data and those for development assistance for health to governments, the authors estimated government spending on health from domestic sources. They used panel-regression methods to estimate the association between government domestic spending on health and GDP, government size, HIV prevalence, debt relief, and development assistance for health disbursed to governmental and non-governmental sectors. The authors tested the robustness of our conclusions using various models and subsets of countries. In all developing countries, public financing of health in constant US$ from domestic sources increased by nearly 100% (IMF 120%; WHO 88%) from 1995 to 2006. Overall, this increase was the product of rising GDP, slight decreases in the share of GDP spent by government, and increases in the share of government spending on health. At the country level, while shares of government expenditures to health increased in many regions, they decreased in many sub-Saharan African countries. The statistical analysis showed that development assistance for health to government had a negative and significant effect on domestic government spending on health such that for every US$1 of development assistance for health to government, government health expenditures from domestic resources were reduced by $0.43 (p=0) to $1.14 (p=0). However, development assistance for health to the non-governmental sector had a positive and significant effect on domestic government health spending. Both results were robust to multiple specifications and subset analyses. Other factors, such as debt relief, had no detectable effect on domestic government health spending. To address the negative effect of development assistance for health on domestic government health spending, Lu and colleagues recommend strong standardised monitoring of government health expenditures and government spending in other health-related sectors; establishment of collaborative targets to maintain or increase the share of government expenditures going to health; investment in the capacity of developing countries to effectively receive and use development assistance for health; careful assessment of the risks and benefits of expanded development assistance for health to non-governmental sectors; and investigation of the use of global price subsidies  or product transfers as mechanisms for development assistance for health.

For full text access click here:

Editor’s note: ‘Fungibility’ of foreign aid occurs when aid substitutes for government spending, resulting in ‘sub-additionality’ rather ‘additionality’, the goal of most development assistance. Among the factors that are complicating discussions of its extent, and what to do about it, are incomplete estimates of development assistance for health (DAH) in the first place (‘untraceable DAH’), variations in accounting practices at country level for total health expenditures, and lack of information about what the resources taken from ministries of health actually are spent on. Although African leaders pledged in 2001 in Abuja to devote 15% or more of their yearly budgets to the health sector and absolute amounts of domestic funding being spent on health have increased 132-242% between 1995 and 2006 in low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the largest reductions in the proportion that domestic funding contributes to health spending occurred in countries with the largest HIV epidemics and the largest DAH contributions. It is not surprising that increasing domestic contributions are overshadowed by external support as countries try to turn around HIV epidemics that are sapping development. Although investment in effective public expenditure management systems is clearly needed to improve accountability from the global level right through to local level, it is important to remember that country ownership starts with nationally set priorities and reallocation of funding to match these.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Vaccines

Neutralization of genetically diverse HIV-1 strains by IgA antibodies to the gp120-CD4-binding site from long-term survivors of HIV infection.

Planque S, Salas M, Mitsuda Y, Sienczyk M, Escobar MA, Mooney JP, Morris MK, Nishiyama Y, Ghosh D, Kumar A, Gao F, Hanson CV, Paul S. AIDS. 2010;24:875-84

The aim of the study was to identify an HIV epitope suitable for vaccine development.  Diverse HIV-1 strains express few structurally constant regions on their surface   vulnerable to neutralizing antibodies. The mostly conserved CD4-binding site of gp120 is essential for host cell binding and infection by the virus.  Antibodies that recognize the CD4-binding site are rare, and one component of the CD4-binding site, the 421-433 peptide region, expresses B-cell superantigenic character, a property predicted to impair the anti-CD4-binding site adaptive immune response. IgA samples purified from the plasma of patients with HIV infection were analyzed for the ability to bind synthetic mimetics containing the 416-433 gp120 region and full-length gp120. Infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by clinical HIV isolates was measured by p24 ELISA. IgA preparations from three patients with subtype B infection for 19-21 years neutralized heterologous, coreceptor CCR5-dependent subtype A, B, C, D, and AE strains with exceptional potency. The IgAs displayed specific binding of a synthetic 416-433 peptide mimetic dependent on recognition of the CD4-binding residues located in this region. Immunoadsorption, affinity chromatography, and mutation procedures indicated that HIV neutralization occurred by IgA recognition of the CD4-binding site.  These observations identify the 421-433 peptide region as a vulnerable HIV site to which survivors of infection can produce powerful neutralizing antibodies. This indicates that the human immune system can bypass restrictions on the adaptive B cell response to the CD4-binding site, opening the route to targeting the 421-433 region for attaining control of HIV infection. 

For abstract access click here:

Editors’ note: Studying the immune response of 3 long-term survivors, who had contracted HIV as children from contaminated blood products 19-21 years previously, revealed a region of HIV that is structurally conserved in genetically diverse HIV strains around the world and is immunogenic, meaning that it stimulates a robust immune response. Purified plasma IgA preparations from each of these 3 patients who were infected with sub-type B neutralized 18 genetically diverse clinical isolates from subtypes A, B, C, D, and AE. This is exciting news because the search for such a conserved epitope, i.e. the part of the virus that is recognized by the immune system and to which an antibody binds, is a holy grail. The site is the 421-433 region of the CD4 binding site of the virus. Interestingly, the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus produces antibodies to this epitope - and HIV and lupus rarely co-exist.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Vaccines

Mosaic vaccines elicit CD8(+) T lymphocyte responses that confer enhanced immune coverage of diverse HIV strains in monkeys.

Santra S, Liao HX, Zhang R, Muldoon M, Watson S, Fischer W, Theiler J, Szinger J, Balachandran H, Buzby A, Quinn D, Parks RJ, Tsao CY, Carville A, Mansfield KG,Pavlakis GN, Felber BK, Haynes BF, Korber BT, Letvin NL. Nat Med. 2010;16:324-8

An effective HIV vaccine must elicit immune responses that recognize genetically diverse viruses. It must generate CD8(+) T lymphocytes that control HIV replication and CD4(+) T lymphocytes that provide help for the generation and maintenance of both cellular and humoral immune responses against the virus. Creating immunogens that can elicit cellular immune responses against the genetically varied circulating isolates of HIV presents a key challenge for creating an HIV vaccine. Polyvalent mosaic immunogens derived by in silico recombination of natural strains of HIV are designed to induce cellular immune responses that recognize genetically diverse circulating virus isolates. Here Santra and colleagues immunized rhesus monkeys by plasmid DNA prime and recombinant vaccinia virus boost with vaccine constructs expressing either consensus or polyvalent mosaic proteins. As compared to consensus immunogens, the mosaic immunogens elicited CD8(+) T lymphocyte responses to more epitopes of each viral protein than did the consensus immunogens and to more variant sequences of CD8(+) T lymphocyte epitopes. This increased breadth and depth of epitope recognition may contribute both to protection against infection by genetically diverse viruses and to the control of variant viruses that emerge as they mutate away from recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

For abstract access click here: 

Editor’s note: In this macaque study, a mosaic immunogen was created by combining the gag and nef genes from geographically and sub-type diverse natural strains of HIV. A much broader immune response was elicited in macaques with this recombinant mix than with a consensus protein. Cellular immune responses to mosaic immunogens recognized a greater diversity of viral epitope variants, with CD+8 T lymphocytes showing significantly greater cross-reactivity, not only to more epitopes but also to more variant sequences of specific epitopes. Keeping up with viral evolution means expanding the breadth and depth of our CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses – it looks like mosaic vaccines may be able to give us the leg up that we will need.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Tuberculosis

Treatment of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Coinfected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Khan FA, Minion J, Pai M, Royce S, Burman W, Harries AD, Menzies D. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:1288-99

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and tuberculosis have an increased risk of death, treatment failure, and relapse. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials and cohort studies was conducted to evaluate the impact of duration and dosing schedule of rifamycin and use of antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of active tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients. In included studies, the initial tuberculosis diagnosis, failure, and/or relapse were microbiologically confirmed, and patients received standardized rifampin- or rifabutin-containing regimens. Pooled cumulative incidence of treatment failure, death during treatment, and relapse were calculated using random-effects models. Multivariable meta-regression was performed using negative binomial regression. After screening 5158 citations, 6 randomized trials and 21 cohort studies were included. Relapse was more common with regimens using 2 months rifamycin (adjusted risk ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.7) than with regimens using rifamycin for at least 8 months. Compared with daily therapy in the initial phase patients from 35 study arms), thrice-weekly therapy (patients from 5 study arms) was associated with higher rates of failure (adjusted risk ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.4) and relapse [adjusted risk ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-12.8). There were trends toward higher relapse rates if rifamycins were used for only 6 months, compared with 8 months, or if antiretroviral therapy was not used.  This review raises serious concerns regarding current recommendations for treatment of HIV-tuberculosis coinfection. The data suggest that at least 8 months duration of rifamycin therapy, initial daily dosing, and concurrent antiretroviral therapy might be associated with better outcomes, but adequately powered randomized trials are urgently needed to confirm this.

For full text access click here:

Editor’s Note: Treatment failure in tuberculosis can be due to true relapse (recurrence of TB with the initial strain) or reinfection (recurrence with a new strain). It is important to distinguish clearly between these two but that requires DNA fingerprinting. It was performed, incompletely, in only 4 of the 27 studies meeting the meta-analysis eligibility criteria. The most striking finding of this analysis is the paucity of adequately powered, well-designed, and well-executed randomized controlled trials on treatment of HIV-TB coinfection. With the mortality rate in HIV-infected patients 6 times higher than in HIV-negative patients, it is urgent to investigate strategies to align these. Daily therapy in the intensive phase (first 2 months) and longer duration of rifamycin treatment clearly were associated with lower rates of failure and/or relapse. Although receipt of antiretroviral therapy was associated with nonsignificantly lower rates of failure and relapse, the SAPIT trial makes clear that initiation of antiretroviral treatment should not wait until the end of tuberculosis treatment (see HIV This Week Issue 79).

Treatment
No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Universal Access

HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for people who inject drugs: a systematic review of global, regional, and national coverage.

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Ali H, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Mattick RP, Myers B, Ambekar A, Strathdee SA; for the 2009 Reference Group to the UN on HIV and Injecting Drug Use. Lancet. 2010; 375:1014-28

Previous reviews have examined the existence of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for persons who inject drugs worldwide, but they did not quantify the scale of coverage. Mathers and colleagues undertook a systematic review to estimate national, regional, and global coverage of HIV services in people who inject drugs. The authors did a systematic search of peer-reviewed (Medline, BioMed Central), internet, and grey-literature databases for data published in 2004 or later. A multistage process of data requests and verification was undertaken, involving UN agencies and national experts. National data were obtained for the extent of provision of the following core interventions for persons who inject drugs: needle and syringe programmes, opioid substitution therapy and other drug treatment, HIV testing and counselling, antiretroviral therapy, and condom programmes. They calculated national, regional, and global coverage of needle and syringe programmes, opioid substitution therapy, and antiretroviral therapy on the basis of available estimates of persons who inject drugs population sizes. By 2009, needle and syringe programmes had been implemented in 82 countries and opioid substitution therapy in 70 countries; both interventions were available in 66 countries. Regional and national coverage varied substantially. Australasia (202 needle-syringes per individuals who inject drugs per year) had by far the greatest rate of needle-syringe distribution; Latin America and the Caribbean (0.3 needle-syringes per individuals who inject drugs per year), Middle East and north Africa (0.5 needle-syringes per individuals who inject drugs per year), and sub-Saharan Africa (0.1 needle-syringes per individuals who inject drugs per year) had the lowest rates. Opioid substitution therapy  coverage varied from less than or equal to one recipient per 100 persons who inject drugs in central Asia, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa, to very high levels in western Europe (61 recipients per 100  individuals who inject drugs). The number of persons who inject drugs receiving antiretroviral therapy varied from less than one per 100 HIV-positive persons who inject drugs (Chile, Kenya, Pakistan, Russia, and Uzbekistan) to more than 100 per 100 HIV-positive persons who inject drugs in six European countries. Worldwide, an estimated  two needle-syringes (range 1-4) were distributed per persons who inject drugs per month, there were eight recipients (6-12) of opioid substitution therapy per 100 persons who inject drugs, and four persons who inject drugs (range 2-18) received  antiretroviral therapy per 100 HIV-positive persons who inject drugs. Worldwide coverage of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services in persons who inject drugs populations is very low. There is an urgent need to improve coverage of these services in this population at higher risk from HIV. 

For full text access click here:

Editor’s note: Although the number of countries with core HIV prevention services (needle-syringe programmes [NSP], opioid substitution therapy [OST], and antiretroviral therapy[ART]) for people who inject drugs is growing, coverage is highly variable and it remains very poor in the majority of countries. Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, one-third of all HIV infections are acquired through injecting with contaminated equipment. Unless there is concerted action to address the risk environments that decrease the likelihood that sterile injecting equipment can be used, HIV transmission through injecting will continue to flourish. Rapid expansion of coverage for the 9 core interventions identified as essential by UNODC, WHO, and UNAIDS is urgently needed. In addition to NSP, OST, and ART, these are voluntary counselling and testing; prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections; condom programming for injecting drug users and partners; tailored information, education and communication; vaccination, diagnosis, and treatment of viral hepatitis; and prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tuberculosis. New interventions are not needed, rather policies to increase implementation of proven HIV programmes clearly are – and that will require that policy-makers recognise that it is high time for rights-based, evidence-informed policies and programming.

No votes yet
  • Share this!
No comment Add a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.