Brijnath B. It's about TIME: engendering AIDS in Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2007 Jul-Aug;9(4):371-86.
This paper analyses how TIME magazine represents sub-Saharan African women in its coverage of HIV. As rates of infection escalate across the continent, researchers are increasingly emphasising the need to understand the socioeconomic and cultural contexts that make women particularly vulnerable to infection. Yet popular media representations of AIDS continue to rely on older colonial imageries of Africa as the feminised, diseased 'dark continent'. This article identifies three major themes in TIME's representation of sub-Saharan African women and HIV: the metaphor of Africa as a woman in crisis, the construction of women as the means of transmission, and the engendered nature of the debate about the impact of international development policies. It is argued that the reliance on familiar cultural narratives often obscures the epidemiological, economic, and cultural realities within which sub-Saharan women live. Not merely a consequence of unprotected sex, AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa is also the result of global economics and politics, reflecting the inequities between the West and Africa, male and female, white and black. The paper concludes with a call for further research on the role of representations of HIV and its actual routes of transmission.
Editors’ note: Western media influence the discourse on AIDS at many levels. TIME magazine, which has a circulation of 28 million people, has taken a special interest in AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. This article underscores the difference between the magazine’s conceptual framework and the lived experience for many women which is rooted in the structural violence of poverty and women’s limited choices which determine with whom they will have sex and under what conditions.
Seeley J, Grellier R, Barnett T. Gender and HIV/AIDS impact mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa--recognising the constraints. SAHARA J 2004;1:87-98.
In discussions of gender and HIV, attention has focused on prevention. This is a vital area. However, Seeley and colleagues argue that there is also a need to focus more attention on the resulting impact of the epidemic, because inequalities that promote the spread of infection are also hampering containment and impact mitigation. The authors propose a framework highlighting the gendered constraints exacerbated by the epidemic. These constraints are reviewed under the following headings: Gender-specific constraints: stemming from the specific nature of gender relations themselves, such as the availability of labour in agriculture, business and for household tasks, as well as access to services and markets, and the incidence of gendered violence. Gender-intensified disadvantages: stemming from the uneven and often inequitable distribution of resources between men and women, including cultural/religious conventions, and the social rules and norms that regulate property rights, inheritance practices and resource endowments. Gender-imposed constraints: resulting from biases and partialities of those individuals who have the authority and power to allocate resources. These include provision of credit, information, agricultural extension and health care. The differential involvement of men and women in development programmes affects access to resources, as does political participation, including involvement in the formulation of policies aimed at poverty reduction. These constraints take us beyond gender relations and sexual behaviour. But women's lives will not change in the short term. The challenges they face in mitigating the impact of HIV will not be addressed by focusing only on their specific vulnerability to HIV infection. Unequal gender relations and the nature of 'development' need to be changed too.
Editors’ note: This conceptual framework is helpful in understanding vulnerability to HIV and its impacts. Gender inequality and the inequitable distribution of resources are constraining both prevention and impact mitigation. Denial by governments and donors of the entrenched nature of these disparities and of the need for sustained social changes stands in the way of addressing women’s lack of access to information, skills, assets, credit, and technology.
Strebel A, Crawford M, Shefer T, Cloete A, Henda N, Kaufman M, Simbayi L, Magome K, Kalichman S. Social constructions of gender roles, gender-based violence and HIV/AIDS in two communities of the Western Cape, South Africa. SAHARA J. 2006 Nov;3(3):516-28.
The links between gender roles, gender-based violence, and HIV risk are complex and culturally specific. In this qualitative study Strebel and colleagues investigated how women and men in two black communities in the Western Cape, South Africa, constructed their gender identities and roles, how they understood gender-based violence, and what they believed about the links between gender relations and HIV risk. First the authors conducted 16 key informant interviews with members of relevant stakeholder organisations. Then they held eight focus group discussions with community members in single-sex groups. Key findings included the perception that although traditional gender roles were still very much in evidence, shifts in power between men and women were occurring. Also, gender-based violence was regarded as a major problem throughout communities, and was seen to be fuelled by unemployment, poverty and alcohol abuse. HIV was regarded as particularly a problem of African communities, with strong themes of stigma, discrimination, and especially 'othering' evident. Developing effective HIV interventions in these communities will require tackling the overlapping as well as divergent constructions of gender, gender violence, and HIV which emerged in the study.
Editors’ note: Knowledge and understanding of the specific social context of communities, including social constructions of gender and masculinities as well as shifting gender dynamics, is key to the design and implementation of effective prevention programmes addressing HIV and gender-based violence.