Nicastri E, Leone S, Angeletti C, Palmisano L, Sarmati L, Chiesi A, Geraci A, Vella S, Narciso P, Corpolongo A, Andreoni M. Sex issues in HIV-1-infected persons during highly active antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:724-732.
Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), morbidity and mortality rates have sharply decreased among HIV-infected patients. Studies of possible differences between men and women in the course of HIV infection give conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess sex differences during HAART. In methods of the study, a literature search by using the MEDLINE database between March 2002 and February 2007 was performed to identify all published studies on the sex-specific differences on the impact of HAART. All articles with measures of effect (preferably adjusted odds ratio, relative risk or hazard ratio with 95% CI) of sex on viro-immunological and clinical parameters during HAART were included. Five different topics of interest in our research were selected: time of initiation of HAART, adherence, viro-immunological response, clinical response and adverse reactions during HAART. Results showed that United States data report an initiation of HAART at an earlier disease stage in men compared with women. After initiation of HAART, most authors do not report any viro-immunological difference, although a few clinical studies showed a significantly better virological response in women compared with men. Nevertheless, women were more likely to be less adherent to antiretrovirals and to have non-structured treatment interruptions than men. This is likely to be related to the higher number of adverse reactions they experience during HAART. Finally, discordant opinions with regard to clinical benefits during HAART exist, but recent clinical and observational trials suggest a better clinical outcome for women. In conclusion, the authors, Nicastri and colleagues, found little evidence of sex differences during antiretroviral treatment. Nevertheless, most of these studies were underpowered to detect sex differences and had limited follow-up at 6 or 12 months. Design of new gender-sensitive clinical trials with both prolonged follow-up and sample size representative of the current HIV prevalence among women are strongly needed to detect the likely sex differences of antiretroviral agents during HIV infection.
Editors’ note: This week UNAIDS convened a consultation in partnership with the Global Coalition on Women and AIDS, the International Center for Research on Women, and Tibotec which focused on the under-representation of women in HIV trials. Entitled ‘Making HIV trials work for women and adolescent girls’, the meeting examined sex differences in biomarkers, pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions; gender differences influencing recruitment and retention; and a number of related topics. More information may be found at www.unaids.org.
Perez-Hoyos S, Rodríguez-Arenas MA, García de la Hera M, Iribarren JA, Moreno S, Viciana P, Peña A, Gómez Sirvent JL, Saumoy M, Lacruz J, Padilla S, Oteo JA, Asencio R, Del Amo J; CoRIS-MD. Progression to AIDS and death and response to HAART in men and women from a multi-centre hospital-based cohort. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007;16:1052-61.
The objective of this research by Perez-Hoyos and colleagues was to study if progression to AIDS and death, as well as clinical and virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), differs between men and women. In methods, the authors studied a multi-centre, hospital-based cohort of HIV-infected patients attending 10 hospitals in Spain from January 1997 to December 2003. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of sex on time to AIDS, survival from AIDS, onset of a new AIDS event or death, and viral suppression from HAART. Of 4643 patients, 27% were women. Women had statistically significant lower viral loads (VL) of 3.9 vs. 4.1 log10/mL (p = 0.02) and higher median CD4 counts of 339 vs. 288 cells/mm3 (p < 0.001) at entry and were more likely to be AIDS free at entry. In univariate analysis, women seemed to show a non-significant lower progression to AIDS (HR 0.88) (95 CI% 0.73-1.07), which disappeared in multivariate analyses (HR 1.03) (95% CI 0.82-1.29). Survival from AIDS seemed to be higher in women (HR 0.65) (95% CI 0.40-1.05), but differences became clearly non-significant after adjustments (HR 0.71) (95% CI 0.42-1.23). No differences were seen in time to new AIDS condition or death after HAART (HR 1.08) (95% CI 0.80-1.46) in multivariate analyses. No differences were seen for time to VL suppression after initiation of HAART (HR 1.07) (95% CI 0.92-1.24). In conclusion, the authors found no differences in HIV progression and response to HAART attributable to gender among patients accessing the Spanish hospital network.
Editors’ note: Women have higher CD4 counts and lower viral loads than men but this does not translate into a benefit in disease progression. Is there a sex difference in the threshold viral load that predicts progression to AIDS in women? Although conclusive evidence is lacking, CDC guidelines suggest that clinicians may consider initiating antiretroviral therapy in women with CD4 counts above 350 at lower viral load thresholds. Understanding the nature and implications of sex differences is important.
Wang J, Stebbing J, Bower M. HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma and gender. Gend Med 2007;4:266-73.
Cancer in individuals living with HIV is a common source of morbidity and mortality, especially in the underdeveloped world. As antiretrovirals are distributed with greater equity across the globe, individuals with HIV are living longer and developing malignancies, as opposed to other opportunistic infections. The objective of this article was to review the gender differences in studies of AIDS-associated cancers, examining factors related to transmission, treatment, and outcome. MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid, conference proceedings, and abstract books were searched from 1983 onward for English-language publications and data on gender differences related to AIDS-associated cancers. Relevant trials were similarly reviewed. The search terms used were women or gender, cancer or tumour or malignancy, lymphoma or Kaposi, and HIV or AIDS. From the results of their search, Wang and colleagues, found that studies in established market economies have focused predominantly on men, although a wider view suggests that the rapidly growing rates of HIV infection among women should prompt specific oncologic challenges. In conclusion, immunosuppression-induced malignancies in women, Kaposi sarcoma in particular, are likely to represent a global issue in the future.
Editors’ note: Few studies have examined sex differences in cancer in the context of HIV infection. Human papilloma virus induced cervical cancer in women is likely to be the predominant cancer among women living with HIV for a long time to come. The effectiveness of the two new HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) has not been reported in women living with HIV infection. Studying this is worthwhile because cervical cancer is an AIDS-defining condition and a major killer of women living with HIV infection.