Moghimi M, Marashi SA, Kabir A, Taghipour HR, Faghihi-Kashani AH, Ghoddoosi I, Alavian SM. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian surgeons about blood-borne diseases. J Surg Res. 2008 Feb 1. [Epub ahead of print]
Perhaps more than any other healthcare worker, it is the surgeons who are at an increased risk of exposure to hepatitis B (HB) virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgeons’ concerns regarding risk awareness and behavioral methods of protection against blood-borne pathogen transmission during surgery. A 31-item questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.73 was used. Of 575 surgeons invited to participate from three universities and one national annual surgical society between May and July 2007, 430 (75%) returned completed forms. Concern about being infected with blood-borne diseases was more than 70 (from a total score of 100). Only 12.9% of surgeons always used double gloves. Complete vaccination against HB was done in about 76% of surgeons and only 56.8% had checked their HB surface antibody (anti-HBs) level. Older surgeons never used double gloves (P = 0.001). Iranian surgeons are not aware of the correct percentage of infected patients with and seroconversion rate of blood-borne diseases, do not use double gloves adequately, do not report their needlestick injuries, vaccinate against HB, and check anti-HBs after vaccination. Educational meetings, pamphlets, and facilities must be provided to health care workers, informing them of hazards, prevention, and postexposure prophylaxis to needlestick injuries, vaccination efficacy, and wearing double gloves.
Editors’ note: These middle-aged surgeons with relatively high surgical experience have not translated their concerns about the risk of blood-borne transmission into highly effective protection strategies. Double gloving, which increases protection by providing a second barrier, is more common among younger surgeons who need to encourage this practice as a surgical norm among their elders, along with masks and protective glasses.
PLoS Medicine Editors. PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 26;5(8):e182. A crucial role for surgery in reaching the UN Millennium Development Goals. Recent efforts to bring surgery into the global health conversation have focused on arguments that surgical conditions should be considered as “neglected diseases” that disproportionately affect the world’s poorest people. There are at least five important reasons
why providing surgery services should be considered a global public health priority. First,
surgical conditions constitute a
substantial global burden of disease, led by injuries, followed by malignancies, congenital anomalies, pregnancy complications, cataracts, and perinatal conditions. Second, surgery is a global public health issue because of
global disparities in surgical care: 30% of the world’s population receives 73.6% of the estimated 234.2 million major surgical procedures performed worldwide each year,
with the poorest third receiving only 3.5%. Third, surgery can be remarkably
cost-effective when compared with some of the interventions that are considered the building blocks of global public health. Fourth, building surgical services, which requires
infrastructure, supplies, and human resources, may in turn
help to build health systems and to
strengthen primary care. Finally, it is
feasible to deliver surgical services even in the most resource-constrained settings. Surgery could play an essential role in meeting many of the 2015 United Nations Millennium Development Goals. For example, trauma care, obstetric surgery, and general surgical services are essential components in reaching
goal 4 (reducing child mortality) and
goal 5 (improving maternal health). Surgery can play a role in
tackling infectious diseases (goal 6): male circumcision may reduce the risk of men acquiring HIV through heterosexual sex by 60%. With foresight and planning, the impending
scale-up of male circumcision services in Africa could help to provide the infrastructure to build surgical services more generally. The authors argue that there is even a
link between surgery and goal 1, the goal of halving the number of people living in poverty. A survey of patients at the Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India found that 85% of men and 58% of women who had lost their jobs as a result of blindness from cataract regained those jobs after surgery. “Improving surgical capacity at district hospital level” was among the top 30 solutions at this year’s Copenhagen Consensus meeting of distinguished economists to the question of how best to advance global welfare, especially the welfare of the developing world. The authors conclude that surgery is beginning to outgrow its status as the “neglected stepchild of global public health”.
Editors’ notes: If this open-access article sensitises surgeons around the world to the potential that their skills can play in achieving human development goals and if the skills of those who are motivated, culturally sensitive, and willing to learn from their national counterparts can be channelled by locally led teams into effective and high quality surgical services for the underserved, then surgery will no longer be a ‘neglected disease’.
May 18th, 2009 at 4:23 pm