Paediatrics
Giaquinto C, Morelli E, Fregonese F, Rampon O, Penazzato M, de Rossi A, D’Elia R. Current and future antiretroviral treatment options in paediatric HIV infection. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(6):375-97. PMID: 18479179 [PubMed - in process]
Because of a lack of prevention policies or problems in implementing prevention of mother-to-child transmission (P-MTCT), most of the 1500 daily new HIV infections in children aged <15 years are caused by MTCT. Fifteen percent of all HIV-infected individuals are children, but the vast majority lack access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which can drastically reduce morbidity and mortality. There are 22 antiretroviral drugs currently approved by the US FDA for use in the treatment of HIV-infected adults and adolescents, but only 12 of these drugs are approved for use in children. Antiretroviral drugs belong to four major classes: nucleoside and nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors and fusion inhibitors. According to international guidelines developed by organizations including WHO, the Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) and the US National Institutes of Health (US-NIH), the treatment of choice for HIV-infected children and adults is a combination of two NRTIs (backbone treatment) plus a third potent agent from a different class, either an NNRTI or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. There are specific challenges in treating HIV-infected children, including uncertainty about the best time to start treatment, the need for more paediatric formulations, the lack of pharmacokinetic studies for new drugs, and incomplete dosing guidelines. Furthermore, the most appropriate regimen for an individual child depends on a variety of factors, including the age of the child; the availability of appropriate drug formulations; the potency, complexity and toxicity of the drug regimen; the home situation; the child and caregiver’s ability to adhere to the regimen; and the child’s antiretroviral treatment history. In addition, antiretroviral drugs are not licensed for all age groups and the drugs are often not affordable. This review describes NNRTI and protease inhibitors as key components of first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), focusing on the rationale for choosing an NNRTI- versus protease inhibitor-based regimen based on the results of available phase II and III studies. Some of the new agents available for children as second-line and salvage therapy both on- and off-label are also discussed. The drug regimens described in this review are relevant to clinicians in developed and developing countries. The availability of new, potent compounds with different resistance and toxicity profiles may represent an alternative option to interclass switching and could redefine ART strategy, including the option of first-line NRTI-sparing regimens.
Editors’ note: WHO has recommended the development of new paediatric fixed-dose combinations containing NNRTIs and protease inhibitors to increase the availability of affordable, safe, and effective formulations for children. With one in every six or seven people living with HIV today being a child under 15 years of age, it is imperative that we increase therapeutic options for children.
Van Rie A, Mupuala A, Dow A. Impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic on the neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 198: Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e123-8. 198.
Paediatric HIV infection is a growing problem in most regions of the world. Data on the effects of HIV on the neurodevelopment of children in resource-poor settings are scarce but necessary to guide interventions. The purpose of this study was to compare the neurodevelopment of preschool-aged HIV-infected, HIV-affected (HIV-uninfected AIDS orphans and HIV-uninfected children whose mother had symptomatic AIDS), and healthy control children in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. In this study thirty-five HIV-infected, 35 HIV-affected, and 90 control children aged 18 to 72 months were assessed by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Snijders-Oomen Nonverbal Intelligence Test, and Rossetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale, as appropriate for age. Overall, 60% of HIV-infected children had severe delay in cognitive function, 29% had severe delay in motor skills, 85% had delays in language expression, and 77% had delays in language comprehension, all significantly higher rates as compared with control children. Young HIV-infected children (aged 18-29 months) performed worse, with 91% and 82% demonstrating severe mental and motor delay, respectively, compared with 46% and 4% in older HIV-infected children (aged 30-72 months). HIV-affected children had significantly more motor and language expression delay than control children. The impact of the HIV pandemic on children's neurodevelopment extends beyond the direct effect of the HIV virus on the central nervous system. AIDS orphans and HIV-negative children whose mothers had AIDS demonstrated significant delays in their neurodevelopment, although to a lesser degree and in fewer developmental domains than HIV-infected children. Young HIV-infected children were the most severely afflicted group, indicating the need for early interventions. Older children performed better as a result of a "survival effect," with only those children with less aggressive disease surviving.
Post new comment